Timeline for How to include a visual for gender option "other" without being offensive?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2017 at 5:43 | answer | added | Devin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 11, 2017 at 14:42 | answer | added | hardnndy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 19:12 | answer | added | PixelSnader | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 17:11 | answer | added | mjvais | timeline score: -1 | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 16:42 | comment | added | Van Du Tran | @Alvaro, like JaneDoe said, it's not mandatory for the function of our app, but in case of social apps (which we are), we do have some cool use for gender if we know it. However, we are open to the option of not including "male" or "female", if that's the better alternative. | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 16:32 | comment | added | Alvaro | What I mean is, why use gender for this classification? You could use other methods to classify (which include 5 selections as you say), and still give the user the option to enter gender. | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 16:30 | comment | added | Summer | @Alvaro Gender is not always important, but in case of social apps people like to have it. | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 16:27 | comment | added | Alvaro | "it's not important that we have the 'real' gender of the user, but we would like to still classify them." why are you using gender to classify them? | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 16:26 | answer | added | Summer | timeline score: -1 | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 16:19 | history | asked | Van Du Tran | CC BY-SA 3.0 |