Timeline for Encouraging individuals to reply to auto-generated emails
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Dec 11, 2016 at 15:39 | history | bounty ended | user1032531 | ||
S Dec 11, 2016 at 15:39 | history | notice removed | user1032531 | ||
Dec 9, 2016 at 22:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUX/status/807348913153961984 | ||
Dec 9, 2016 at 21:40 | answer | added | bloodyKnuckles | timeline score: 1 | |
S Dec 9, 2016 at 16:57 | history | bounty started | user1032531 | ||
S Dec 9, 2016 at 16:57 | history | notice added | user1032531 | Draw attention | |
Dec 8, 2016 at 23:53 | history | edited | user1032531 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 206 characters in body
|
Dec 8, 2016 at 23:51 | comment | added | user1032531 | @MMacD Who has an admin staff now a days? And it is typically to have several proposals each day which need to be submitted. And while I appreciate your interest, I am not asking about the need for a proposal distribution system, but only how to communicate to the recipients that they can reply to an auto-generated email. | |
Dec 8, 2016 at 19:16 | comment | added | MMacD | I continue to feel that the whole thing seems dodgy at best. Why is your site involved at all, if it's a tiny RFP list? Why doesn't the requestor's admin staff do the responding? | |
Dec 8, 2016 at 14:00 | comment | added | user1032531 | @MMacD It is not spam. The sender knows every recipient and each recipient is expecting an email from the sender. The application is a proposal submission tool. A typical reply is "Got your proposal John. Thanks". | |
Dec 8, 2016 at 12:08 | comment | added | MMacD | I downticked your question because improving the ability to spam doesn't seem like a good (ethical) task for HF. | |
Dec 7, 2016 at 15:40 | history | edited | user1032531 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Dec 7, 2016 at 14:58 | history | asked | user1032531 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |