network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Germany | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | Mar 5 at 20:20 | |
| stats | profile views | 10 |
|
Aug 8 |
comment |
User suggestions in electronic dictionary I would choose the Google method. The less data requested from the user the greater his willingness to contribute from time to time. Right? |
|
Aug 8 |
comment |
User suggestions in electronic dictionary I wouldn't say searching users are no potential contributors in general. I would say, most of them won't contribute but a few of them will do. So one has to make contributing as easy as possible. So the best thing is probably to do just voting which doesn't require that much participation by the users, right? And saying that I should use "support aging", do you refer to functions becoming enabled after some time or after some actions? |
|
Aug 7 |
comment |
User suggestions in electronic dictionary Oh yes, now I've understood your question :) My "readers" and "editors" or searchers and contributors are probably the same group. The case of users who are only there to contribute ("writers") appears less likely. The potential "writers" are (in most cases) in the big group of passive "readers". |
|
Aug 7 |
awarded | Student |
|
Aug 7 |
comment |
User suggestions in electronic dictionary I can't define the "group of searchers" more precisely, sorry :( The dictionary offers help to anybody who isn't really sure about the meaning of a word. So there might be absolute beginners who don't have any knowledge to contribute with - but their might also be experienced speakers who just wanted to make sure again. So we have 50% possible contributors maybe ;) |
|
Aug 7 |
asked | User suggestions in electronic dictionary |
