There are several ways to present text on your web page in exactly the font your designer decided; as an image, a flash hack, some javascript hack, dynamic fonts. But to this day, the only thing that seemingly works on all platforms is the old text-as-graphics solution. This is a kludge, of course, but for accessibility purposes, is using an image containing the text as an alt-attribute considered ok? Vision impaired users would get the text, as would search engines. Or am I missing something?
|
|
With some caveats.
|
|||
|
|
|
Alt text's value is decreasing from SEO point of view, so it seems it we all can focus on accessibility and optimize alt text-s for screen readers. As far as I know, it has only some percent influence on your SERP ranking |
|||
|
|
|
One of the biggest disadvantages with text-as-graphics is their inability to scale with text size (note: text size, not zoom). Sizing the image in ems might help to mitigate this. Also, bear in mind that maintainability suffers greatly when using images, unless they're dynamically generated. And, it's pretty inefficient to serve an image when all you want is a custom font - the file size of an image is a LOT greater than the equivalent text. |
||||
|
|
|
I see no problem with it. I've never heard anyone say that it's a bad idea. But try to avoid or do the following:
|
|||
|
|
|
That seems like a brilliant solutions to me. Though I'm not an expert, as I've never though about the problem before today, and I've never experimented or used screen readers. If all/most screen readers automatically read the alt text, and the reading flow throughout the page makes sense when using a reader, I'd say: Go for it! |
|||
|
|