Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

On most web applications that involves albums (for example flickr or facebook), the album title is set before the photos. However, the photos are the main part of a album. So why aren't the photos uploaded first, and than later (next screen, or bottom of the screen) you name your album?

After you explain me why I'm wrong - are there legitimate uses for a scenario where you pick photos first and the name last?

share|improve this question

5 Answers 5

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Going off of DA01's answer which I agree with, Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics can also be applied to this case.

In terms of matching the Desktop and Email GUI/pattern, this also extends to what desktop's and emails are based off of which are real life desks and letters. We usually title notebooks before using them, and title letters before writing them. Adding a subject to these things gives them focus and allows us to organize more easily.

Match between system and the real world The system should speak the users' language, with words, phrases and concepts familiar to the user, rather than system-oriented terms. Follow real-world conventions, making information appear in a natural and logical order.

share|improve this answer

It's a common pattern.

Desktop GUI:

  • create folder
  • name it
  • stick things in it

Email:

  • create email
  • give it a subject
  • add content

So that's perhaps one reason...it's a typical flow.

But that's not to say you are wrong to consider it. It may very well make sense. Give it a try!

share|improve this answer
    
People frequently send an e-mail with "No subject". But ok, nobody creates a folder without a name. –  fotanus May 9 at 19:57
2  
@fotanus untitled folder, untitled folder 2, untitled folder 3 –  Jacob Raccuia May 9 at 20:07

I think it has to do with the human brain.

By setting the name first, we know what we want to group everything by. When selecting from a group of photos, how do you know how you're going to group them by until you tell yourself? First we select "bears" and then we select all of the pictures of bears.

My argument isn't very strong, but I feel much more comfortable knowing what I'm going to be selecting files for, before I do it.

share|improve this answer
    
I sympathize with the idea, apart of having no proff. –  fotanus May 9 at 23:07

If you where going to upload random photos it would make sense to add the name afterwards, based on what photos you have uploaded.

On facebook and flickr you don't upload random photos, you pick the ones from your trip to Paris, from your birthday, etc. You know what the album is going to contain before uploading photos. If you know, it makes sense to name it too.

share|improve this answer
    
not necessarily true. Random photos uploaded to facebook go into a default folder called "wall photos" –  Anindya Basu May 9 at 20:27
    
Which is already named by Facebook. It's the place where everything that doesn't have a certain theme goes. It could be called "Random photos" and it wouldn't change it's meaning or purpose. Not the same in an album. –  yoYO May 9 at 20:36
    
In addition, Facebook isn't a tool for organizing things. –  DA01 May 11 at 16:36

I think you are talking about the difference between folder and tag, which have different mental models. Here is a blog post about it:

blog post

and below is a summary of the post:

enter image description here

Overall, I think folder systems encourage a narrow and deep hierarchy, while tag systems encourage a wide and shallow hierarchy.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.