User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

Worldwide 1024x768 is still the most common screen resolution. Why they had chosen the width as 1024 and not a user remembrance number like 1020 or 1030?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Kit Grose, JonW May 9 '14 at 7:48

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Re-post of this – Imran Bughio May 9 '14 at 6:56
I've marked this as a duplicate because that question covers most of the same ground as this one. Also, you cite no evidence that 1024x768 is the most common resolution. On the contrary, worldwide it appears 1366x768 is the most common. Nearly 3x as many machines run at that resolution than 1024x768. – JonW May 9 '14 at 7:55

The resolution of 1024x768 has an aspect ratio of 4:3. If the width is 1030, the height would be 772.5 pixels and since there are no half pixels, 1030 pixels is not possible.
1020 pixels would be possible, but perhaps 1024 was the maximum amount of pixels they were technically able to fit inside a screen.

share|improve this answer
It is far more likely that 1024 was chosen because it is a power of 2. Hardware wise that is a lot easier to implement and doesn't waste anything. – Marjan Venema May 10 '14 at 11:30

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.