Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am working on a forum design project and I have a question for the input mechanism for that forum, while replying to a post user can

  • Some font properties (can be ignored)
  • Insert multiple Images
  • Insert link (with preview)

Basically, this isn't a technical forum and user are not suppose to have advance knowledge of web. Also, most of the user will use this site from handheld devices.

So, what kind of editor should I use

Like Facebook

enter image description here

cons

  • Multiple things (ex. Image post and link sharing) can not be done at once
  • User can not share more than one URL

WYSIWYG editor without preview

enter image description here

Cons

  • User has to be aware about the functionality of WYSIWYG editors.
  • Difficult to write from mobile devices.

WYSIWYG editor with preview

Just like Stackoverflow or discourse.org

Cons

  • Same as WYSIWYG without preview + more space requirement which could be troublesome with mobile devices

So which editor should I choose which could help me overcome all these cons or at least reduce them.

to summarize I am looking for a editor which can offer me many functionality & can be use by normal internet users (like my grandpa) on web or mobile devices.

share|improve this question
2  
Sounds like a job for user testing! Your "cons" are also somewhat short-sited. Your Facebook cons: do users need to do that sort of stuff? If no, they aren't cons; if yes, that isn't the right choice. Your WYSIWYG cons: if you don't know the functionality of the editor it should be inherent in the design, and not working well on mobile devices means you didn't design for mobile devices like you should have. WYSIWYG + Preview, same deal. You need design for what the user is doing on your site, not what users do on other sites. –  Evil Closet Monkey Apr 18 at 17:10
    
@EvilClosetMonkey Thanks for the advice. +1 for the last line. My requirements are tending more towards WYSIWYG editor but I am worried about basic level internet users and usefulness on mobile devices. –  Zerotoinfinite Apr 18 at 17:20
    
There is nothing "advanced" about a proper WYSIWYG editor that would perplex a novice level Internet user. They just have to type, they don't have to use any of the features and you shouldn't force them to. Your editor does not necessarily need to be the same (and probably shouldn't) be the same on a desktop and mobile. –  Evil Closet Monkey Apr 18 at 18:16
    
@EvilClosetMonkey Thanks again ! Does that mean I can have different input type for web and for mobile? Will that not create a confusion in users mind? I mean, for some users who are habitual for using those features on web will expect the same on mobile devices also. –  Zerotoinfinite Apr 18 at 18:32
1  
Mobile and desktop have very different input modalities. If you throw a desktop webpage at a mobile user, or a mobile webpage at a desktop user, that is what will screw them up. Give desktop users desktop interfaces, and mobile users mobile interfaces. Neither Facebook or StackExchange (to use your examples) provides the same interface to post entry on the desktop and mobile - they're different! –  Evil Closet Monkey Apr 18 at 19:14

2 Answers 2

I would honestly build the least amount possible, release it and wait for people to ask for more features. Start with allowing simple text input and auto-linking urls. Autolinking can make it easy to spam your forum though, so watch out.

share|improve this answer

I'd put in a small button that shows (expands) / hides (collapses) the more advanced Stack-Exchange-style features. It's convenient to access, but doesn't clutter anything if the user doesn't want or need it.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.