Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would like to know the difference between a font and a typeface. If anyone could please help me.

I tried to Google it, but I can't understand that in general, Why the term 'Fonts' is used rather than 'TypeFaces'?

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 12 down vote accepted

I think the best explanation I have found was in this article which explains how fonts constitute a typeface. To quote the article

A typeface is a family of fonts (very often by the same designer). Within a typeface there will be fonts of varying weights or other variations. E.g., light, bold, semi-bold, condensed, italic, etc. Each such variation is a different font. The only evolution in terminology that results from the transition from metal-cast to digital fonts is that (point) size is no longer fixed.

From a historical perspective of how the word font came about, You should check out this excellent article which explains the difference between the two and also talks about the history of the word font. To quote the article

Around the fifteenth century, when printers hand-set type, they had to pull actual metal letters, numbers, and symbols out of a giant box.

enter image description here

This collection of characters was called a “font.”

With regards to typefaces

Typefaces describe the overall look of the characters contained within the font. If you see in Fig. 2, you’ll see a font of News Gothic – News Gothic is the typeface.

enter image description here

Also to quote this article on Nextweb

“the physical embodiment of a collection of letters, numbers, symbols, etc. (whether it’s a case of metal pieces or a computer file) is a font. When referring to the design of the collection (the way it looks) you call it a typeface.”

Lastly these definitions from Adobe can help explain it further

typeface The letters, numbers, and symbols that make up a design of type. A typeface is often part of a type family of coordinated designs. The individual typefaces are named after the family and are also specified with a designation, such as italic, bold or condensed.

Font

One weight, width, and style of a typeface. Before scalable type, there was little distinction between the terms font, face, and family. Font and face still tend to be used interchangeably, although the term face is usually more correct.

share|improve this answer
    
You mean to say that font is the size and style of a typeface.!? And a typeface consist of two or more fonts with glyph specified in that font!? –  Vivek Parekh Mar 25 at 10:43
    
So a file that contains descrioption of how each symbol should be visually represented is a Font, and a Typeface is the general concept of that visual representation? –  user1306322 Mar 25 at 13:39
    
A typeface is the aesthetics and design of lettering. A font is the physical thing you use or install. "Typeface" is to "font" as "song" is to "track" or "MP3". Your handwriting is a typeface without a font. Wingdings and Chartwell are fonts without a typeface. –  user568458 Mar 25 at 17:16

A typeface is a distinct design of glyphs, a font is a specific variant therof, consisting of a full set of glyphs.

Helvetica is a typeface, as is Courier. They are different typefaces, and by definition different fonts.

Helvetica condensed bold is a font, as is Helvetica italic. They both belong to the Helvetica typeface, but they are different fonts.

share|improve this answer
2  
Nice and short answer! –  Henrik Ekblom Mar 25 at 13:20

There is a clear distinction:

Helvetica is a type family. Helvetica Bold is a typeface. 12pt Helvetica Bold is a font.

I remember the definition this way: Family > Face > Font

share|improve this answer
    
That was true in the days when type was a physical object. But in the digital world, your second example is both a typeface and a font. In other words, it's not so clear. –  DA01 Mar 25 at 22:45

There isn't a clear difference. There is no hard-and-fast definitions of the two.

As other's have pointed out, common usage is that the font is specific to a set of actual letters (be it physical or digital) and typeface is the overall design (that would usually be applied to a number of fonts as a family).

A physical example would be: Futura Bold 12pt lead type.

A digital example would be: Futura-Bold.ttf

But in common usage, was also use 'font' interchangeably with 'typeface'. "Which font are you using? Helvetica?"

share|improve this answer
1  
I agree with your point of the terms being used interchangeabley in vernacular, but in typography jargon, there is a difference. –  Bakabaka Mar 25 at 15:35
    
@Bakabaka but it's not absolutely clear. There is no typographic definition set in stone for these terms. In fact, a lot of typographic terms are loosely defined. Historically, we could perhaps be more clear (font = one purchasable set of physical letters at a certain size) but the digital world has blurred things quite a bit. –  DA01 Mar 25 at 15:40
    
An example would be open type. You can now have one opentype font that also happens to contain a complete typeface family (albeit a smaller family). –  DA01 Mar 25 at 15:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.