Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have been tasked in making some licenses on a search portal more understandable to our users. These licenses are listed as facets, so that the user can filter out which licenses they are interested in...

The issue is that these licenses are called things like:

Paid Access, CC0, Public Domain, CC-BY-NC-SA, CC-BY-ND

...which unless you are familiar with creative commons, you will not really understand.

I have tried to break it down into two elements, one for the general public, and one for the more advanced users who wish to be very specific with what they are searching for.

I wonder if you could critique this suggested method. I am really interested in the open/close suggestion, and also the label "Personal use". Any thoughts greatly appreciated!

enter image description here

share|improve this question
3  
The licences filter is useful only to people really understanding them. For others can I use it commercially, can I modify, seems better filters. –  ColdCat Sep 24 '13 at 12:47
    
what is the difference between "freely usable" vs. "public domain" ? –  kmonsoor Oct 10 '13 at 12:23
    
CC0 is the same thing as public domain. –  kinokijuf Oct 15 '13 at 20:47
    
Hi @kinokijuf they are different, you can read about CC0 here - wiki.creativecommons.org/CC0_FAQ –  Dean Oct 23 '13 at 7:56
    
@Dean let me rephrase: CC0 is a form of public domain. –  kinokijuf Oct 23 '13 at 18:30

2 Answers 2

I think Creative Commons-Attribution-NonCommercial can be understood by a person who isn't familiar with Creative Commons licenses. If you want a wide audience to understand you I would recommend against using the abbreviations for the license names.

I can't really imagine a usecase where someone might want to search for files that allow for limited reuse but that person doesn't have to know whether he can use the files for the purpose that he wants to use them. To do so he needs information about commerical use or attribution requirements.

How about providing 5 checkboxes:

  1. Freely usable
  2. Attribution
  3. Noncommerical
  4. Share Alike
  5. No Derivations

You could add explanations when a user hovers over the terms.

share|improve this answer

I would change Personal Use to "By Terms of Use" or "By License Terms", because those sub-items don't address Personal use, but more often commercial use.

I like the show advanced, except don't need the "close advanced". Just leave it open and save the clutter.

Also, if you can, put the results on the right side (and right justified, possibly with digit grouping), that would make your results more scannable. Might want to use dark grey for those numbers instead of black, so there is clear separation between selectable options and data. If you do these two changes, then you can also get rid of the parentheses. Just a technicality, but I assume that those specific licenses are part of Limited Use, and therefore the totals should reflect that in your wireframe.

share|improve this answer
    
IF you remove the "close advanced" then you'll cause a problem for people who click on it to see what's under there, but discover they don't understand any of it. It's better to give them the option to hide it away again. –  Racheet Oct 15 '13 at 10:29

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.