Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Has the Eclipse Platform implemented with any concepts of ISO-9241 in mind? If so, which parts?

Is the menu functionality provided by the Eclipse Rich Client Platform adhering to ISO 9241-14:1997. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -- Part 14: Menu dialogues, if used standardly, as implicated by the providers?

share|improve this question
    
There are some nice summaries of the standard on our friend Wikipedia, including depreciated sub-sections. Do a quick scan over there. Some are harder to test than others without special equipment (pixel defects spring to mind) but most are easy to verify with a working knowledge of the application. –  Gusdor Sep 16 '13 at 9:46
2  
The question is broad. ISO 9241 has approximately 37 parts. A more focused question about ask about Eclipse's adherence to one part, e.g., Part 14 - Menu Dialogues. Also 'Eclipse Platform' is ambiguous. It could mean any one of the 13+ Eclipse packages available on the Eclipse Foundation's Downloads page or it could mean the Eclipse Rich Client Platform that is the starting point for creating rich client's with Eclipse –  JonW Sep 19 '13 at 8:05
    
I've edited the question to clarify what I'm actually asking for. –  s.d Sep 20 '13 at 9:39

1 Answer 1

In the 2007 Master thesis Exploring Usability Guidelines for Rich Internet Applications Eclipse is mentioned as a tool used, but never in compliance with ISO 9241. The same goes for the Eclipse wiki, where Rich Client Platform is a big part. Nothing on ISO 9241 is mentioned on these pages. If you search for "ISO" you find reference to other standards such as 8807, ISO-8859-1 (8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets used in web pages), 3166, 704, 9000 and more standards - but not 9241.

To conclude, it's a fair assumption that Eclipse Rich Client Platform is not complaint with ISO-9241. If it where, it would have been mentioned.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.