Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm adding on to an advanced search screen, the standard few sort orders: by date, by name, etc.

I'm just wondering what the more commonly used/accepted way of phrasing it would be. "Chronologically" sounds more technical, but "by date" is a bit clearer, I think.

Are there circumstances which would influence your use of one over the other?

share|improve this question
11  
Who are your users? –  vincebowdren May 22 '13 at 13:54
    
@vincebowdren A small number of people with admin access. Technical ability could vary, but there is in-app help and we do a bit of training for the application. The other side of the application is data gathering out in the field, and this search is to narrow down that data and show pre-created reports as well as the raw data (lists of survey answers or checklists). –  Gray May 22 '13 at 14:08
2  
If your users are all in a particular technical field where 'chronologically' is in frequent use, that might be better; but otherwise, probably 'by date' as per the answers below. –  vincebowdren May 22 '13 at 14:16
1  
Huge 'upvote' for @vincebowdren, this should always be the firs thing you think about. Which term is better known to your clients/users? As good as all these answers below are, none of them seem to take into account the target user. –  Ryan McDonough May 23 '13 at 11:05

8 Answers 8

up vote 73 down vote accepted

"Sort by date" is probably the most common option, but it's not the way that most people speak. Where possible, I prefer speaking like a human (as opposed to an engineer), and so I would prefer using something like:

Newest first or Oldest first

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for the yellow highlight –  rk. May 22 '13 at 13:56
    
This is a great alternative that didn't even cross my mind. –  Gray May 22 '13 at 14:09
4  
+1 I absolutely agree with Newest First or Last, but would disagree with the use of "Sort by newest". As a native English speaker (admittedly an engineer), this doesn't readily state its intention if you allow forward/reverse ordering. "newest" implies newest records on top while sort by implies ability to reverse this ordering. I would prefer "Sort by Date" over "Sort by Newest". My 2 cents –  im so confused May 22 '13 at 20:19
    
@AK4749 Fair point. I'll remove "sort by newest". –  JohnGB May 23 '13 at 2:18
    
I'm sorry but I strongly dislike this answer in context of the question. I like the functionality of "Show: Newest first" but if you want to present sorting options like user Gray intends to then this is asking for a different type of functionality and as you corrected you cannot "Sort by newest". –  John May 23 '13 at 6:02

Tthe word 'chronologically' is not only too long, but too technical and advanced for most people to understand. You want to make things easy and that includes the choice of words you use on your UI.

share|improve this answer

Sort by Date - Definitely!

Why? - simple and easy - almost everyone understands 'Date' - takes less screen space with just 'Date' and an arrow indicating the Sort - familiar (+intuitive?)

Why not chronological? - will take up more screen space unless you chose to abbreviate which adds to confusion - not a very common word - technical - just because you are training and have help and documentation is no reason to complicate the UI and interaction

I would have suggested chronological if your target audience and application dealt with history and science related data, but not for normal computer files.

share|improve this answer

For a non-native English speaker, the word "Chronologically" might not even be known. "By Date" is definitely better.

share|improve this answer
    
It's not an everyday sort of word, but it is of Greek origin :) It's "cronologicamente" in Italian (using Google Translate), "chronologicznie" in Polish, "cronológicamente" in Spanish, "chronologiquement" in French, "kronologisk" in Norwegian etc. My point is not that it should be widely used in UI, I agree that it's not a very good choice. My point is that - contrary to what you suggested - being a non-native English speaker doesn't really much change the likelihood of being familiar with this word –  Konrad Morawski May 29 '13 at 6:30

My pick is Sort by Date because it is

  • easy to understand
  • is common and used by Operating Systems and
  • doesn't arise any further questions in your mind and you know what it is.
share|improve this answer

I think you have two options:

The first one is to sort database entries (chronologially, alphabetically, numerically) and the second one is to sort a list by a column value (data object attribute).

It might depend on the amount or type of options you are going to present.

In the first case you would have the text "Sort" followed by a dropdown with the options:
- chronologically
- alphabetically
- numerically

In the second case you would have the text "Sort by" followed by a dropdown with the options:
- date
- name
- etc.

I would try to not mix the two. And as a technical person I'd prefer "by date" as well.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for clarifying the difference. I would add that in the first case, it can be ambiguous about which column you are using for sorting; there might be a number of text attributes all available for sorting alphabetically. That confirms my opinion that 'By date' is most likely best. –  vincebowdren May 22 '13 at 14:14

I would agree that "by date" is the best for the following reasons: - Shorter and simpler: looks cleaner and takes less time to read the words - Users will not have a miss, specially because "by date" is the most commonly used term

Even though some words sound better in terms of being more elegant or more correct, for buttons and elements that trigger actions in the web the language used should be simple, direct and using as less words as possible.

share|improve this answer

Ideally, I would go with 'by date' since it is more accessible. Even people with English as their non-primary language understand the word date easily, where as chronological might be a hit or a miss.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.