Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there any user research or testing on the smallest size a 16:9 video could play on a website, where the user doesn't feel it's too small?

share|improve this question
1  
In pixels? Millimetres? –  MSalters Apr 19 '13 at 10:38
1  
What is on the video? Talking heads? A movie? Text? –  Kit Grose Apr 21 '13 at 8:28
    
Percentage, too. –  David Clarke Apr 22 '13 at 1:56
    
In pixels I guess as the video will be on screen. The content in them will be sports news and match highlights. –  Santi May 12 '13 at 23:21

1 Answer 1

Where the user doesn't feel it's too small?

This is subjective and would vary by person, age-group, and screen real estate percentage. My assessment is that no one likes to see small video - unless it was in bad quality and watching it in large (or full screen) size would make the video visually punishing.

... OR you were watching a video and working at the same time.

The MPEG-1 Code has the smallest resolution of an NTSC video stream as: 352x240. When converted from a 4:3 aspect ratio to a 16:9 aspect ratio, it becomes 352x198.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.