Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I work in a very large, established company with a consistent philosophy of, "If it's not broken, don't fix it." The (large) division of the company that is responsible for maintaining customer records uses a text-based mainframe interface from the 1980's. From my perspective, the bright side of this system is that we can hook into and control the mainframe session object via .NET for screen-reading, task automation, etc. The down side is that it's extremely user-unfriendly and the training cycle is extensive to teach everyone all the commands and what each of the fields mean. Months to proficiency and years to master.

What I'd like to do is create an adaptive wrapper -- something that processes each of the fields and input areas on the screen and presents it as something easy/quick to understand by the end user. A natural flow. The division is about to hire a few hundred people, more than usual, and getting them off the ground quick is very important.

Data Entry example: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E13187_01/JAM/v51/cross/wwimages/CP72.gif Record definition

Customer Record example: http://seindal.com/ConsoleMVS38.jpg data entry

These two images are examples of more-or-less similar systems. From a programming point of view, the screen is a grid and each character on the screen is accessible by (X,Y) coordinates. The tricky part will be that there are hundreds of mainframe screens, so rather than redo the interface for each one, I'll be using dynamic fields and reconstructing screens dynamically on the fly. I'm confident that I can handle the programming to read all the data and input areas and repaint it in a different shape.

I need some expert advice on exactly what shape that could be. I've been impressed with some of the examples of work that I've seen on this site, and it's an interesting challenge, so I thought I would ask for any tips? Thanks for any help.

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by Matt Obee, JohnGB, Benny Skogberg, Charles Wesley, Bennett McElwee Apr 3 '13 at 8:24

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
Maybe I'm a bit old and dusty, but I love TUIs. If you are reconstructing the screens on the fly, what becomes of all the arcane field names and abbreviations necessary to fit the TUI into the 80x24 character box? How do you change them and how would you teach your users their meaning? –  Deer Hunter Mar 31 '13 at 21:27
2  
I'm just afraid it's not possible to form a good general recommendation. The system is too complicated for that, and in the same time it needs plunging in to come up with ideas for specific parts of it. –  Dominik Oslizlo Mar 31 '13 at 21:35
2  
You aren't going to be able to generically update the UI and expect huge gains in learnability/ease of use. You need to study your users, generate designs and then test them. There are no shortcuts. –  superduperfly Apr 1 '13 at 0:15
2  
I'd say the command line interface is the biggest hurdle. You would help everybody by adding a simple "grid and detail forms" approach on top of it. Never mind skeuomorphism. Take baby steps and concentrate on learnability of the new interface and on making it easy to get things done. Get that right, and even the experienced users will soon forget all about their lovely command line interface with which they could ... whatever. –  Marjan Venema Apr 1 '13 at 8:47
1  
Consider looking at an application like Perforce's p4v which 'wraps' a CLI. It still shows the text command, which helps users transition from one interface to the other. –  Alex Feinman Apr 2 '13 at 19:17
show 2 more comments

1 Answer 1

I think that Marjan Venema's comment should be rewrite as answer to question and I vote for it. The only restriction could be that each user must know current application interface. In case new users can use alternative new software all the time this application definitely should be redesigned. What about mobile client app with this legacy interface? It sounds like a joke, isn't it?

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.