Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are your opinions, which of the following text are easier to read?

  1. CCW text in one row
  2. CW text in one row
  3. CCW text in two rows
  4. CW text in two rows

And what if the writing is on a vertical flag? (for example on the wall of a building?) Would you prefer 5. CCW flag or 6. CW flag? (Above the head of the reader, for example starting 4 m high.)

enter image description here

I found a detailed study on Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. Their results are the following on the basis of 2 experiments on 10 and 24 young native English speakers (adults). It would be interresting to study this topic with much more people (for example here).

enter image description here

They have tested the following text types:

enter image description here

Can you add any additional resources regarding CW vs CCW rotated vertical text in print design? Or do you have any "ultimate solution" answer to my question?

My opinions:

  • On a book 2. CW text seems more natural and easier to read (and it is commonly accepted, although I've found a different book on the shelf)
  • But in case of a flag I would prefer 5. CCW text since you have to look up to the flag, and I suppose you start readign on the bottom.

I found these QA-s on stackexchange but all are about web UI-s, not print design:

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

Counter-clockwise. It is easier (scientifically proven as far as I am concerned) that it is easier for people to correctly orientate CCW text than CW.

Additional resources? Hows a Harvard Psycho-linguist? http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/papers/Finke_Pinker_Farah.pdf

CW is even worse for multi-line, because us westerners are trained to read left to right, top to bottom. 2 or more lines CW violates these rules.

share|improve this answer
    
Doesn't two or more lines of CCW text equally violate normal reading order? Two lines of CW you're reading top-to-bottom but right-to-left. With CCW, it's left-to-right but also bottom-to-top. –  Mark D Mar 25 '13 at 15:10
    
@MarkD Yes, you are right, but I think because you can easily mentally rotate it and it allows the reader to more easily follow what they have been wired to do. My interpretation, of course. But When I read rotated text CCW is far easier to read in multi-line. –  Austin French Mar 25 '13 at 15:21
    
Curious. I've always found CW text more easily readable than CCW, especially when scanning books in a bookcase... Possibly because less head movement is involved? –  Marjan Venema Mar 25 '13 at 18:20

This is a very loaded question that will be strongly affected by a cultural bias.

As I mentioned on the issue you linked, there are competing standards in different parts of the world. In the US and Commonwealth countries, text on spines is oriented top-to-bottom (i.e., rotated clockwise), whereas in mainland European and Latin American countries, it's the opposite.

Each standard has some unique advantages:

  1. In the top-to-bottom format, books laid on a table with their covers facing up have readable spines. This is particularly ideal when it comes to single books like coffee table books:

    Coffee table books, demonstrating the spines being readable while laying face-up on a table

  2. In the bottom-to-top format, a series of volumes remain in logical order whether stood vertically or laid horizontally, which makes a lot of sense in things like DVD racks or bookshelves:

    A series of books shown with European spine orientation, demonstrating that they remain in order even when laid flat

There's no one right answer. For me—as an Australian—I'd always choose top-to-bottom vertical text, since that's the convention in my country. Breaking the convention comes at a higher cost than being "right" for one specific controlled scenario.

If I was publishing a book for distribution in Europe, I'd print the spine bottom-to-top for the same reason.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.