Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While developing games for mobile devices, should I consider implementing In-App Purchases like currency system (The users buy virtual "money" to get upgrades) or enabling users to buy specific items (Like for $1.00 get specified Weapon). Is this consider a good UX practice, and if it is, which method work best for the user?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by DA01, kontur, Matt Obee, JohnGB, dhmholley Feb 7 '13 at 12:34

Questions on User Experience Stack Exchange are expected to relate to user experience within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2  
in general, in-game 'upgrade' purchases tend to be an annoying user experience. –  DA01 Feb 7 '13 at 5:54
    
I think you should rephrase the question to make it fit the purpose of the site (including adding a specific question) –  edgarator Feb 7 '13 at 8:48

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

You should charge outright for the game instead. I find it frustrating when I get into a a game that is "incomplete" or where I need buy "toughness" to keep it up with good records or other players. With a limited number of exceptions I tend to delete these apps from my devices!

On the other hand, buying expansion packs, is not that annoying.

share|improve this answer

In my opinion, having "virtual currency" gives a user more flexibility and is less annoying as compared to buying individual upgrades. As a developer it gives you more flexibility because you may add more "upgrade" options without creating them on the Apple Portal.

You can have multiple "coin packs" ranging from small (having less number of coins and costing less) to large (in which you may decide to give a bulk-buying discount). So users may decide how much they want to spend at a given point.

share|improve this answer
    
I disagree. I find it annoying to have to buy a stash of some virtual currency ('coins') in order to do a purchase. First of all, it requires me to do another step. As opposed to doing the buy directly, I now have to first buy 'coins' and then use that to buy the upgrade itself. Second: after doing that upgrade, I am now left with some left over 'coins' that I have no use for. Nice profit for the game owner, but annoying for the user. –  André Feb 7 '13 at 15:13

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.