User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've just heard about "Asirra" and tried it. But, I am a little bit confusing about using. What is your choice for usability?

Asirra or CAPTCHA, and why?

share|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

CAPTCHA is Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart. So, indeed, Asirra is (a type of) CAPTCHA... If you mean the warped text type of it, I think Asirra is not useful because:

  • it requires use of mouse
  • it requires more time than warped text
  • it requires specific interest while trying to fit in a design

I think best type/way is reCaptcha.

share|improve this answer
How do you know it requires more time than warped text? A user study for Asirra suggests it takes 15 seconds to solve a challenge, with 99.6% of users succeeding after two challenges. – Patrick McElhaney Jan 27 '11 at 14:30
not talking about the perception, I am talking about the time you understand the thing... writing a word vs. hovering twelve images and clicking few of them... come on, which requires more time... I will search for a user study of warped text capthca... – spinodal Jan 27 '11 at 15:34
reCAPTCHA has been pretty much hacked (kind've), and I find it very hard to read. With better hackers, there are harder pictures. With ASIRRA, it's very easy for humans, very difficult for bots, and...IT'S CATS!!! – Markasoftware Dec 24 '13 at 3:34
@Markasoftware any proof of that? ReCaptcha exclusively uses OCR failed text, it seems rather unlikely that it's been "hacked" – VoronoiPotato Feb 10 '14 at 16:51
This doesn't seem to have been released to anyone, but:… – Markasoftware Feb 10 '14 at 23:45

I had never heard of that one, interesting method.

However personally, I find it more user-friendly not to require a captcha (or assira) at all unless there are high enough indications that it might be spam, that way most users are not punished for wanting to interact with the website.

For more ideas, you could check out Can we do better than CAPTCHA? or the article Death to CAPTCHAs as well.

share|improve this answer

For a blog, or some unofficial fun sites Asirra is OK, but for business sites I would never use it!

  • it requires too much space
  • hardly fits to any design
share|improve this answer

Personally I would avoid the use of any form of captcha wherever possible - they are a proven factor for form abandonment. There are some nice alternatives discussed here - the "honey pot" one in particular is a great idea.

share|improve this answer

We conducted a usability test (30 participants), and came to the conclusion that QuizCAPTCHAs rate first in terms of success rate and speed of solving, followed by ReCAPTCHA. Asirra was comparable to ReCAPTCHA, with the odd outcomings that especially elder participants had real difficulties telling cats and dogs apart. So I'd go for a math-based QuizCAPTCHA, or ReCAPTCHA, if you don't mind the Google part.

share|improve this answer

I have basically the same objection as spinodal - it requires extensive use of a mouse and even if you fail to mark a single picture correctly, it considers you a bot

there is a better alternative - somewhere in the middle between reCaptcha and Asirra

you can use the logic of Asirra and ask user a simple question, such as: what is the next day after Wednesday? - or - enter the next whole number before the number 5

share|improve this answer
Asirra will accept a user who achieves two near-perfect scores; it does not require perfection. – supercat Dec 19 '14 at 20:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.