User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm creating a social sharing bookmarklet and button that lets users share a link along with an optional text.

What structure is more recommended to use?


or with a folder:

(Or a completely different one?)

share|improve this question
Do you see a particular user experience benefit one way or the other? – Matt Obee Jan 7 '13 at 13:36
What is the UX aspect of this question ? – Mervin Johnsingh Jan 7 '13 at 14:47
up vote 0 down vote accepted

I personally think that using share as a variable in the URL describes the nature of the link more readily instead of a "folder" called share.

It explicitly implies that the URL following "share=" is the URL being shared as opposed to:

which doesn't imply the intended action as well. I also like Kayo's version, it makes for a more descriptive URL while defeating the arbitrary nature of having share as a "folder".

share|improve this answer

I don't know why the '/share/' sub-directory would be needed. Perhaps be more explicit in your variable names.
share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.