Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am struggling with a client who has a (slightly irrational) dislike of slider controls.

I need to provide an alternative that can accommodate 233 selection points, of which maybe 10 are common selections but all are entirely feasible.

I tried a spinner but there just seems to be too many points for accurate and easy pinpointing.

Are there any usable alternatives?

share|improve this question
2  
Does this need to be for desktop and/or mobile? –  Roger Attrill Dec 11 '12 at 9:11
1  
@RogerAttrill Good question, and if it's a responsive site (for example) would sliders even work or would you have to revert to a different control when a 233-point slider is on a x320 screen? Hmm. –  JonW Dec 11 '12 at 9:14
    
It's primarily for desktop but will be designed responsively, so I do need to consider how it will render on mobile and whether we'd need to revert to a different control type (designed for desktop first because of the context of use). –  sparklypips Dec 11 '12 at 10:44
add comment

4 Answers

Are sliders absolutely out? Could you 'make sliders more bearable' for your client - some kind of 'custom' slider that eases the pain that sliders can often have.

For example, sliders could have 'magnetic lock points' when you get to default or historical values. Spinboxes too, could be customised to pause spinning for a short while when they reach a default or historical value.

Some time ago now, I had an idea for a smart spinbox that combined elements of a spinbox and a slider, as well as a couple other enhancements. Maybe all this could be the seed of an idea.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
    
The fear of sliders is difficult to over come with this client. They had horrendous versions that nobody could use, then someone redesigned them and managed to make them worse, affecting conversion. I love your enhanced spinbox and initial feedback from them is positive so many MANY thanks! –  sparklypips Dec 11 '12 at 13:33
add comment

A calendar style control provides access to 365 days of the year (ignoring the change in year itself), so could be tweaked for your purpose so as to provide at least as many choices as you need, grouped into whatever makes sense for your situation.

Without knowing more about your context (including whether it's for desktop and/or mobile), it's hard to suggest what actual tweaks you might want to make.

share|improve this answer
    
On first thoughts I like this idea but my concern is that I have no way of categorising the values (whereas a calendar is usually categorised into months so you can filter down to maximum of 31 values). –  sparklypips Dec 11 '12 at 12:26
add comment

Yes there are.

If the control has to provide total control (pun intended) then a slider isn't always your best bet, since they are quite inaccurate.

One way to quickly set a value on a large interval is to use the same pattern that is used on mobile alarm clocks.

enter image description here

This way the user can specify a value on a range of controls that increase/decrease the value of different magnitude.

share|improve this answer
    
How usable is something like this on a desktop application? The touch and hold action feels more smooth and natural on a mobile device, but I don't think I would have the same dexterity with releasing a mouse click. –  sacohe Dec 11 '12 at 9:12
1  
@sacohe I totally agree. I can honestly say that I assumed this was for mobile, but reading the question again I see it's quite ambiguous. –  AndroidHustle Dec 11 '12 at 9:14
    
Apologies for the original ambiguity, please see comment above. –  sparklypips Dec 11 '12 at 10:45
add comment

This may very well be a very bad suggestion, but have you considered knobs/dials (think volume control on an amplifier, or some visual abstraction)? There will probably be interaction issues, and it is effectively a bent/circular slider, but you can still have the predefined points AND the finer resolution points in-between. Maybe it is worth as a last-resort?

share|improve this answer
    
I'm pretty sure that's what she meant by that she'd tried using spinners. –  AndroidHustle Dec 11 '12 at 9:52
    
Apologies. I thought spinners were similar to the slot-machine type elements, often encountered when setting alarms on mobile phones. I was specifically referring to circular dial/knob, found on most radios/amps/ovens etc. –  CJ Franken Dec 11 '12 at 10:00
    
By slot machine type element, do you mean a switch..? Like on/off? –  AndroidHustle Dec 11 '12 at 10:02
    
And there's me thinking spinners were obviously spinboxes ;-) –  Roger Attrill Dec 11 '12 at 10:39
    
@RogerAttrill haha, yea I can see that too! However, she said spinners were not an alternative because it was hard to be accurate enough. That should not the problem with spinboxes, however in most other regards a hassle to deal with... :-) –  AndroidHustle Dec 11 '12 at 10:43
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.