User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We have our Terms of service available as HTML and PDF. Is there a good reason to keep providing PDF version?

It's extra work:

  • Several languages
  • Privacy policy / tos
  • Room for mistakes between html and pdf

Google for example, doesn't provide PDF for their TOS or Privacy Policy. But is there a good reason to do that (or not)?


share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The goal of a TOS document is legal protection. A plain text / HTML document does this better than a PDF document, so there is little (if any) benefit to including a PDF version.

The UX question should really be about making the TOS more human (rather than lawyer) readable, as that is an area where most sites can improve a lot.

share|improve this answer
Agree on goal. But why a plain text would do it better than a PDF? – alesas Nov 29 '12 at 13:47
PDF is a proprietary format and less accessible than plain text. For there to be an agreement you would have to be able to prove that the person could read the document, which is a lot harder for a pdf than plain text. – JohnGB Nov 29 '12 at 13:54
Totally makes sense! – alesas Nov 29 '12 at 14:00
And if you have adobe reader, you have a "print to PDF" function on your computer to boot, so a naitive PDF is extra useless – Ben Brocka Nov 29 '12 at 15:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.