Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When did people start talking about User Experience as a role/domain similar to the way that it's used today?

The earliest reference I can find is the Norman, Miller, Henderson CHI 95 piece on Apple's set up (Donald Norman, Jim Miller, Austin Henderson: What You See, Some of What's in the Future, And How We Go About Doing It: HI at Apple Computer. Proceedings of CHI 1995, Denver, Colorado, USA)

Anything earlier?

[Edit - after @Andrew's nice answer we have 1993 as an earlier date

"I invented the term because I thought Human Interface and usability were too narrow: I wanted to cover all aspects of the person's experience with a system, including industrial design, graphics, the interface, the physical interaction, and the manual." - Don Norman

]

(I'm writing a talk on communities of practice relating to UX - and want to get my time lines right ;-)

share|improve this question
1  
The question needs to pin down 'What is the current meaning of User Experience'... –  PhillipW Oct 16 '12 at 9:44

7 Answers 7

Here are a few pre-digital references (courtesy of Google Books search) to the use of the phrase "user's experience", in reference to the domain of incorporating individual human experience as product design feedback:

Reliance Motor advertisement, Electrical World, vol. 70, no. 14 (October 6, 1917):

This is the new general service motor that represents the user's experience

Right at the start we admitted that we didn't know it all and went to the user before building Type T motors. Thirty five prominent electrical engineers in the iron and steel mills and machine shops showed us just what they wanted and needed to meet the demands of their work. These thoroughly practical men have thousands of motors under their care. They see revealed daily in their repair departments the weak spots of motors of every type and make. As a result Type T motors represent the combined ideas of men who have unusual opportunities to learn the need for quality and strength in every motor detail. No motor could be more thoroughly the result of recommendations and criticisms from men in the field whose needs it is intended to meet.

See a similar advertisement in Factory, September 1917.

The Commercial Motor, January 16, 1908:

Effect of User's Experience on Design

This care and practice has resulted, as has been noted already, in a design of details which give very little trouble, and to this state the manufacturer of motor parts is approaching, but he would do so at a quicker rate if the matter were laid hold of more systematically, and if there were closer contact between maker and user. A railway company, as a rule at least, designs, if it does not build, the locomotives it uses, and is therefore in a position to benefit by its experiences.

The Process Photogram, April 1907:

Many reproducers are also producers of effective design; and there are many able specialist designers working for the advertiser. In this series we wish to represent some of the most efficient work, with brief notes on the user's experience. Advertisers and designers are asked to submit examples of their most successful displays.

Timber & Wood Working Machinery, March 15, 1905:

In the home trade Messrs. Sutcliffe have supplied machines to the British Government and plants to several Corporations for tramway departments; but about the most important contract has been the fitting up of the new moulding mill for Ashworth, Kirk & Co., of Nottingham, and we herewith give an illustration of the machine with which they were supplied. It appears that Ashworth, Kirk & Co. approached John Sutcliffe & Son, Ltd., and arranged to have a machine specially made for them, incorporating numerous improvements especially necessary in their business. In this machine we have the engineer's skill aided by the machine user's experience, the result being a machine that is as perfect as possible, a sample of the highest class of machine construction, and capable of doing the work that it is intended for in the best possible way, and being easy to manipulate.

The Autocar, April 11, 1903:

A User's Experience:

Rosario, Lewisham Park, London, S.E., 2nd April, 1903.

The car, I thought you would like to know, is giving me every satisfaction, and I have done some 4,000 miles on same. (Signed) A. E. THOROWGOOD.

share|improve this answer

The following is a quote from Brenda Laurel's chapter essay "Interface as Mimesis" (in User Centered Systems Design, eds. Norman & Draper, 1986, ch. 4, p.69). I've included enough context to show that the exact phrase "user experience" (emphasis added in quote) was used in specific reference to the domain of computer interface design:

Likewise, an interactive computer program may be intended to enable its user to do a variety of different things - find information, compose and format a document, play a game, or explore a virtual world. The user's goals for a given application may be recreational, utilitarian, or some combination of both, but it is only through engagement at the level of the interface that those goals can be met. An interface, like a play, must represent a comprehensible world comprehensibly. That representation must have qualities which enable a person to become engaged, rationally and emotionally, in its unique context.

Naturally, there is disagreement on this point. The critics point to the all-to-common case in which computer users are willing to submit themselves to heinous interfaces and have dreadful experiences, as long as they are able to get the job done (my own experiences with UNIX Emacs come to mind). So might drama buffs endure perfectly awful plays, to the end of being able to chat about them later. But in seeking design principles for good interfaces, we must, it seems to me, concern ourselves with the best case, and ask, not what the users are willing to endure, but what the ideal user experience might be, and what sort of interface might provide it.

share|improve this answer

I want to point out this publication:

ANKER HELMS J0RGENSEN

Thinking-aloud in user interface design: a method promoting cognitive ergonomics

Ergonomics, Volume 33, Issue 4, 1990

The abstract:

The thinking-aloud method has been used successfully in user interface research. The present study investigates the application of the method for user interface design. The study is based on interviews with nine systems designers who had used the method in design practice. Their application ofthe method wasin general very successful. This paper focuses on a unique property of this method: its inherent promotion of cognitive ergonomics due to the timely, genuine and applicable feedback to the designers in the design context.

This extract shows, that in the context of the paper the thinking-aloud method was used to get feedback on user interfaces:

The thinking-aloud method consists in having a user working with a computer system (prototype, paper mock-up or documentation) while 'thinking-aloud', i.e., spontaneously (or prompted) verbalizing ideas, facts, plans, beliefs, expectations, doubt, anxiety, etc. that comes to mind during the work. Typically a scenario is developed for the tests, i.e., an artificial work context with specific tasks that can be accomplished by means of the system.

The term "user experience" is also explicitly mentioned in a citation:

One of the most striking results of the application of the thinking-aloud method is the value of the feedback the designers get in context, thereby overcoming one of the main problems with the formal methods (limitation of scope) and informal guidelines (mismatch between the normative guidelines and the design context at hand). Whiteside and Wixon (1987) put it thus:

 Usability, ultimately, lives in user experience.
 Therefore usability engineering must be grounded in experience.
 Usability engineering provides tools for uncovering user experience (p. 17).

The reference to which Jorgensen refers to is:

WHITESIDE, J. and WIXON, D. 1987,The dialectic of usability engineering, in H.-J. Bullinger and B. Shackel (eds) Proceedings oj Human-Computer lnteraction-s-lNTERACT '87, (Elsevier, North-Holland), 17-20.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks and good find. –  adrianh Oct 22 '12 at 9:45

I think the danger of this type of question is that it can identify when a term was first used, without consideration to whether the term meant the same thing then as now. For a formalised definition, we need to turn to ISO 9241-210, which defines user experience as:

"a person's perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated use of a product, system or service".

According to the ISO definition this includes all the users' emotions, beliefs, preferences, perceptions, physical and psychological responses, behaviors and accomplishments that occur before, during and after use. The ISO also list 3factors that influence user experience: system, user and the context of use.

share|improve this answer
    
Standards are awful for historical references - standards are made after folk start doing things... that's why they're standards ;-) –  adrianh Oct 19 '12 at 10:17
    
Oh, absolutely - the problem is, without a standard definition, what one person thinks UX is can be wildly different to what another person thinks it is, so the 'doing' part can be graphic design or coding rather than what we think of as UX :) –  Peter Oct 19 '12 at 12:14

The first record (I could find) on User Experience comes from Mark Twain’s “Nineteen rules governing literary art in domain of romantic fiction” written in 1895. These 19 rules could easily be transferred to writing for the web today which is a part of User Experience. Here are some of them:

(1) That a tale shall accomplish something and arrive somewhere.

(4) They require that the personages in a tale, both dead and alive, shall exhibit a sufficient excuse for being there.

(5) The require that when the personages of a tale deal in conversation, the talk shall sound like human talk, and be talk such as human beings would be likely to talk in the given circumstances, and have a discoverable meaning, also a discoverable purpose, and a show of relevancy, and remain in the neighborhood of the subject at hand, and be interesting to the reader, and help out the tale, and stop when the people cannot think of anything more to say.

(13) Use the right word, not its second cousin.

(14) Eschew surplusage.

(15) Not omit necessary details.

(17) Use good grammar.

(18) Employ a simple and straightforward style.

Mark Twain did not use the phrase User Experience, but it’s easy to see that this is what he actually meant.


General disclaimer: I’ve interpreted the question to a slightly different meaning, and when you read the answer you should think of it as an answer to the question When was User Experience first used? which could be useful for adrianh’s talk on “communities of practice relating to UX”.

share|improve this answer
1  
Nice. Thank you ;) –  adrianh Oct 19 '12 at 10:16

In terms of 'what it means today' its really only been around since 2005.

Here's the Wikipedia history for it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_experience&dir=prev&action=history

Don Norman uses the term in his 1999 Book: The Invisible Computer

Here's the 1999 Amazon review of the book:

Technologies have a life cycle, says Donald Norman, and companies and their products must change as they pass from youth to maturity. Alas, the computer industry thinks it is still in its rebellious teenage years, exulting in technical complexity. Customers want change. They are ready for products that offer convenience, ease of use, and pleasure. The technology should be invisible, hidden from sight.In this book, Norman shows why the computer is so difficult to use and why this complexity is fundamental to its nature. The only answer, says Norman, is to start over again, to develop information appliances that fit people's needs and lives. To do this companies must change the way they develop products.

They need to start with an understanding of people: user needs first, technology last--the opposite of how things are done now. Companies need a human-centered development process, even if it means reorganizing the entire company.

share|improve this answer
    
I beg to differ on the 2005 front. I know I was using it before that - and the question included a reference to a 1995 usage in the same context ;-) –  adrianh Oct 16 '12 at 8:08
    
Was Don's usage in 1995 what we'd recognise as UX nowadays Adrian ? Although Jakob used a different term back in 1993 the approach he was mapping out was pretty similar to current practice: useit.com/jakob/useengbook.html –  PhillipW Oct 16 '12 at 9:40
    
This answer should ideally clarify the difference between the pre-2005 usage and the post-2005 usage - at the moment it just mentions that there is one. –  user568458 Oct 16 '12 at 9:41
    
@PhillipW - yes it was. I'll edit the answer with a quote. It's the term "UX" I'm after tracking - not the working practices (the working practices were around long before the term was ;-) –  adrianh Oct 17 '12 at 8:38
    
As an aside Adrian, in the Invisible Computer Don uses the abbreviation UE. The UX abbreviation seemed to appear during the last decade. I've often wondered whether it was inspired by Windows XP (eXPerience)... –  PhillipW Oct 17 '12 at 10:16

Peter Merholz actually did a very thorough investigation into the term "User Experience". http://www.peterme.com/index112498.html

It looks like the earliest recorded usage was meeting notes from 1993 by a colleague of Donald Norman's at Apple. The notes imply that Norman changed the job title "User Interface Architect" to "User Experience Architect". Norman has discussed inventing the term in interviews.

The term "user's experience" was used by Brenda K. Laurel in "Interface as Mimesis" (from Norman & Draper's User Centered Systems Design, 1986).

share|improve this answer
    
That's great stuff Andrew - thanks. –  adrianh Oct 16 '12 at 8:06
1  
And I actually had the Norman and Draper book too. Branda Laurel uses talks about the user experience - but it's not used in the context of a role/domain. Good stuff though. Thanks. –  adrianh Oct 16 '12 at 8:22

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.