Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I think the title says it all. "Cockpit-like" is what I've come up with, but I'm looking for better ideas.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Ben Brocka Apr 14 '12 at 22:26

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

4  
I like the term 'craptastic'. That or 'designed by offshore outsourcing' –  DA01 Oct 21 '10 at 20:26
5  
Being a pilot, most cockpits are laid out exactly like you want them to be... Problem is, you have to know how to use it before you even stand a chance at learning how to use it. Same with poorly desgned interfaces. Documentation on these is usually inversely proportional to how easy to understand: More difficult = less documentation. I have bar a verrrry long margin, seen these type of intefaces come out of Offshore outsourcing projects, so i'll go with that... –  JohnnyJP Oct 22 '10 at 8:26

26 Answers 26

Being a "Rube Goldberg" device is commonly used to identify complex, but mostly useless things.

And cockpits are getting better...

share|improve this answer
    
What I'm talking about isn't uselessness, just complexity. (Usually of the undesigned or poorly designed variety, though I'm sure in the case of actual cockpits, there's a ton of design in them. And I'm sure they are getting better, but they still have that reputation....) –  sprugman Oct 21 '10 at 17:28
    
Rube Goldberg machines mostly did do something useful, just in a very complicated way - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rube_Goldberg_machine . See also "Heath Robinson" for our non-US friends. –  DJClayworth Oct 25 '10 at 19:43
    
I guess that Rube Goldberg machines require careful designs. Therefore, I do not think that it is a good name for something which lacks designing. –  Tsuyoshi Ito Nov 3 '10 at 21:12

How about:

  • A Bureaucracy

  • A Boston (with streets running in ad hoc directions, it’s one of the hardest cities in the US to navigate).

  • A CASTLE

  • A Mortgage Derivative

share|improve this answer
2  
Ha! I like 'a boston' –  DA01 Oct 21 '10 at 20:28

Kluge (or kludge)?

share|improve this answer

I've heard the phrase "What a 1040" used before.

(FYI non-US folks: Form 1040 = US tax return.)

share|improve this answer

How about a spaghetti UI? "spaghetti code" is already common in programming.

share|improve this answer

Part of the problem you'll run into is finding a term that has a wide enough distribution - many terms like this are specific to a particular culture or geography.

That said, here are my suggestions.

Interested to see other peoples ideas.

share|improve this answer

"Lotus Notesesque"

share|improve this answer
1  
Or how about simply "Notesque"? Rhymes with "grotesque." –  Michael Zuschlag Oct 22 '10 at 20:49
    
But the program is called "Lotus Notes", not "Lotus Note". –  Lèse majesté Oct 24 '10 at 5:33
2  
Clearly, it should be Lotesque ;) –  Asmor Nov 1 '10 at 18:58

Dancing bearware

Paraphrasing Alan Cooper: The remarkable thing about a dancing bear is not how well it dances -- it's actually terrible -- but that it dances at all.

share|improve this answer

"This looks like it was designed by engineers."

share|improve this answer
4  
I take offense to that. Engineers are more than capable of designing good interfaces. In fact, I would say that graphic designers are MUCH worse at designing a USABLE interface. –  Charles Boyung Oct 22 '10 at 16:41
7  
The problem is that most engineers design with implementation details in mind and focus on possibilities. That makes great interfaces when your users are engineers, too. Of course there are exceptions. –  peterchen Oct 22 '10 at 21:15
2  
Read The Inmates are Running the Asylum. +1 –  Glen Lipka Oct 23 '10 at 15:11
2  
I'm with Charles. Poor design is poor design... and I've seen an awful lot of bad design by people who call themselves "designers" - and some rather good design by folk who call themselves "engineers". I find broad characterisations of one group by another harmful. –  adrianh Oct 23 '10 at 17:43
3  
That's not a broad characterization of one group. That's just a statement of reality--good design takes practice, experience, and specific training. That doesn't mean you can't be both an engineer and a designer, but someone who is just an engineer is unlikely to produce good UI designs, just as a designer isn't likely to produce good engineering. I mean, would you hire a plumber to perform heart surgery? –  Lèse majesté Oct 24 '10 at 5:44

A long time ago, a Micky Mouse watch was one that quickly fell apart, hence Micky Mouse this and that, so how about Micky Mouse interface?

share|improve this answer

Call it a "Death Star". Remember what all the control devices aboard that looked?

share|improve this answer

Entropy.

Because it would make a good seed for a pseudo-random number generator.

share|improve this answer

Kitchen Sink Beta

share|improve this answer

Scrapyard. 'nuff said.

share|improve this answer

Cluttered?

Or point them to this lovely cartoon :-)

http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2008/03/05/simplicity/ alt text

I'd say "Cockpit-like" is a poor analogy since while the interface is complex they are highly designed. The complexity is needed - there's just a lot of information that needs to be easily accessible.

share|improve this answer

Microsoftesque?

share|improve this answer
    
What, is this not catchy enough? –  Indolering Aug 8 '11 at 21:31

Developer UI

Coined by Joseph Cooney

Expaned on by Jeff Atwood

share|improve this answer

How about?

  • Clutter-ware
  • SNAFUI - Situation Normal All F'ed Up Interface
  • Anti-Designed Interface
  • Anti UI (pronounced ant-eye-you-eye) :)
share|improve this answer

BUI - Bad user interface

share|improve this answer

JIRA

pretty catchy, I think

share|improve this answer

Our particular favourite term to use in our office is "Facerolled."

As in, "When they designed that, they must have just rolled their face across their keyboard and hoped for the best."

share|improve this answer

I like the term angry fruit salad even though it's usually about the overuse of colors.

share|improve this answer

Too bad "The Matrix" is a great movie: Classic WTF - Enter The Matrix

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

The classic comparison used to be the Space Shuttle's UI.

Just be careful which buttons you press on re-entry...

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/images/content/70412main_KSC-99PP-0412.JPG

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.