I've seen links to switch to the "Classic" site or the "Standard" site and I was just wondering if anyone did any testing with this. I like the sound of "full" but I have nothing to back it up. Any insight would be helpful.
|
|
I have no researched data to give you, but two personal observations: 1) Flicker uses flickr.com as the link back to the main site. This makes sense in the context that their mobile site is m.flickr.com. 2) I really like IMDB's method: View IMDb in: Mobile | Desktop with the one you are not currently looking at being made a link. The advantage of this option is the context is clear that there are two versions of the site. |
|||
|
|
I've been using View Full Website with no problems on various projects. I prefer this wording because it marks the potential differences in functionality and content between mobile and desktop views, but doesn't assert the differences along the lines of device choice. |
|||
|
|
|
In my opinion it would be the best if your site is able to detect the visitors screen resolution, and switch to a version which is designed for his/her own device. (tablet or mobile as well) And in this case I would display the opprotunity to "View Desktop Version". |
|||
|
|
|
I would probably call it the "standard site view", as the only thing which is changing is the type of view of the website you're seeing. You're not changing a version - as it's essentially the same content and the way it works |
|||
|
|