User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question follows on from this question: Better term for “user”.

If it's bad UX to call people using your product "user" then isn't it also bad UX to structure your URL's as

Is there a better term to use that is human readable (so no /u/bobsmith) and clear to most people?

share|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

If there is a better term, it will be very relative to your business. could be appropriate for most news services, even if free.

This can also be quite different from 'profile' paths

vs. 'account' paths,

where the former is about public image, and the latter is about configuration and preferences. though most trends today avoid generics like 'profile' instead using the content terms that come from said-user's interaction, e.g.
share|improve this answer
+1 It's not often that I see a new better answer to an old question. Very nicely done. – JohnGB Mar 25 '13 at 13:37

It's an extremely contentious issue whether "user" is a bad word or not. If you want to maintain any clarity I would strongly advise against calling all people in all situations 'people.' You can't get any less specific and unhelpful than that. As long as there is a distinction between people that user or have access to your service and people in general (there always will be) it makes more sense to use a more descriptive word.

However, I'm not sure /user/ is required in your URL structure, it seems like an unnecessary subdirectory, at least from the ahem user's point of view. Note that Twitter, Google +, Youtube and many other popular profile/user content based sites just use or, this is most applicable when the user has their own little "page" or section on the site however, and if this is just an account/profile page it wouldn't be as applicable.

If it's more like an account management URL you could consider but if it's a profile the large majority of sites still use, including this one. People know what user means and they'll be more familiar with the term in this context than any term you make up to try and be touchy-feely. Unless you have good reason to believe your users feel insulted, uneasy or confused each time they read the word "user" I would stick to semantic convention.

share|improve this answer
Nice response, Ben. Most people will know what it means in the url - at least, within the small subset that actually look at the url - so why go out of the way to introduce uncertainty. – gef05 Sep 27 '11 at 13:20

“User” is not a bad word. For example, Dailymotion uses it in Web addresses, like this : You can also choose the word person.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.