Take the 2-minute tour ×
User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm working on an app that requires someone to rate the how they did at recalling an item (to which they are shown the correct answer before they rate the item). The three options are: wrong, right, and easy. With easy meaning that it was right they didn't have to think about it to get the answer.

I'm open to suggestions of name changes that improve the clarity, but this question is more about how to make it easier for users to scan them without having to read the text each time - with particular interest on the "easy" option.

Two example mockups we have so far are:

enter image description here

and

enter image description here

How would you represent these 3 buttons, and what improvements can you suggest over the current ones, with emphasis on the easy option?

share|improve this question
1  
Will the user know whether they have done a task wrong? Could be an idea to simplify it to just 'difficult' or 'easy'. –  benb Sep 16 '11 at 10:03
    
Yes, I should probably reword the question. They are trying to recall something and when they see the answer they rate how they did at recalling the item. –  JohnGB Sep 16 '11 at 10:38
2  
It would be slightly painful for the people who now have to answer both "Wrong" and "Easy" ;) –  MSalters Sep 16 '11 at 12:22
    
I agree - decide first on what you are trying to measure, and that may drive the UI. Right vs. Wrong is just common sense, but "easy" just doesn't fit that pattern. –  Wonko the Sane Sep 16 '11 at 14:42
add comment

4 Answers 4

up vote 16 down vote accepted

PhilipW is right in that you don't need to say right, because that implies that easy might not also be right. I'm assuming a task has to be completed to get to this stage and that users have some indication of right and wrong, and that they have some element of measurement by which they can consider the task to be easy or hard?

Based on the information given, here's a visual that might be easier to scan:

enter image description here

[edit1] added comparison following Gilbert's comment

enter image description here

[edit2] and here's a couple of options that group the hard and easy as both not being wrong (ie right!)

enter image description here

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
4  
Love the double tick for easy. –  JohnGB Sep 16 '11 at 10:33
1  
Nice visual buttons. I'm concerned that making the Easy button green sends a subliminal message to the user that the tasks are supposed to be easy. Maybe yellow would be better? –  Gilbert Le Blanc Sep 16 '11 at 12:46
    
good point (and assuming they aren't all supposed to be easy.) @JohnGB - what is the outcome (and for whom) when the user clicks more on hard than easy. –  Roger Attrill Sep 16 '11 at 12:52
1  
It's answers like this that make me love coming here... –  John N Sep 16 '11 at 14:11
1  
@RogerAttrill: Me likes :) –  JohnGB Sep 16 '11 at 14:25
show 5 more comments

Wrong, Right, Too easy

The too easy should maybe have the same visual clues as the Right option. Too easy is still Right, right?

share|improve this answer
    
+1 I disagree with the "difficult" or "hard" button labels as even if something wasn't easy/obvious - I think someone judging their own effort won't tick "difficult" or "hard" even if they had to think for a while... –  Oskar Duveborn Sep 16 '11 at 14:28
add comment

I'd go for a 3 button scale - arranged in order:

Wrong / Difficult / Easy.

You don't need to say right - as this is implied by the first option 'wrong'.

share|improve this answer
    
Good point. That does indeed help clarify the issue. –  JohnGB Sep 16 '11 at 10:27
add comment

I'd make the three options refer specifically to difficulty - "Couldn't do it!", "Difficult!", "Easy!". This makes more sense to the user (there's three comparable options), but because your options now easily fit a 'sliding scale', you can use imagery based on traffic-light schemes or numbers.

For instance, you could now use a set of coloured faces (red / angry - impossible, yellow / neutral - tricky, green / happy - simple) or sets of one, two and three domain-relevant icons, with the number signifying difficulty (eg, for recipes, one chef's hat for easy, two for tricky, and three for impossible).

share|improve this answer
    
How do you fit "couldn't do it!" on a button? –  JohnGB Sep 16 '11 at 10:52
    
Impossible? ••• –  Patrick McElhaney Sep 16 '11 at 11:01
    
<sub>couldn't do it</sub> - damn - that doesn't work in comments :-) –  Roger Attrill Sep 16 '11 at 11:49
    
Larger buttons, shorter synonymns. There's a couple of things you could do. What's important is that the three options are directly comparable (e.g on a sliding scale), both for user perception (makes more sense to the reader) and because it provides more opportunities for iconography. –  Jimmy Breck-McKye Sep 16 '11 at 12:09
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.